Wednesday, June 11, 2008

Top Civil Servant talks to small groups & media - still avoiding 21st century notion of a "blog"

Another article in the newspapers about Canada's top Civil Servant, Privy Council Office Clerk Kevin Lynch gave another exclusive presentation about the state of the Canada's public service (it's aging, still, and will retire, in droves). The article writes that Lynch "has taken to regularly meeting with small groups in an effort to provide a glimpse of what the government is working on".

I'm not sure how it helps that Canada's top civil servant is talking to small groups, including the media, to disseminate his message to the masses when he can very well do it himself with a very basic blog. With a blog, the media, public servants, and the whole public can get the message directly, instead of filtered through a journalist's assessment and recollection and interpretation of the events.

I know that Lynch can get his message out, with his online index of speeches on his PCO Clerk website, but this isn't the same. I was at a meeting two months ago where a consortium of universities were presenting how they plan to get the government of Canada up to speed on Web 2.0 Collaborative tools, by showing their own progress among - themselves. My response at the meeting was that what has worked in the academic sphere may not and likely will not work in the government sphere. Canada's public service has a much different culture, in Academia information is freely shared, undergo rigorous review and practice. In the public service, information is horded, protected, and developed anonymously. Not to say there isn't any potential for Canada's public service, but the cultural barriers need to be broken down first before we consider the tools and platforms.

I indicated that direction from the top, Kevin Lynch, should enable us to get on the path of becoming less risk averse with our information hording and more risk managed with our information sharing. I pointed to Kevin Lynch's (at the time) latest speech where he said:

"[The] 'gotcha' mentality in the press and at times in Parliament, where error free government, not risk management by government, has become the benchmark for success or failure...Innovation in public policy thinking and in public service delivery is not possible without risk taking, where success is not always guaranteed nor failure precluded...More of the solution lies with attitudes towards risk taking in the public service by the public, press, Parliament, and government."

I think this is a very important citation. I said if we were going to finally be about information-sharing, maybe we could start with Kevin Lynch having at least RSS feeds on his speeches and reports, so I don't need to keep checking every 2 days for new content, and that his speeches or reports should be in a blog format, or allow for commenting (that are moderated of course). The response to this was not favorable, as some in the room who actually have worked in the past with the current and past PCO clerks voiced that they "were unsure just how successful that would be" and the idea failed.

After the meeting two analysts from PCO said I hit the nail right on the head at capturing what "Mr. Lynch" was saying in his speech. I guess his message just isn't getting out there to the people outside his office who need to know most. Like the people who were around that table discussing the possibilities of collaborative software in the government.

Why doesn't Kevin Lynch have a blog (or even an RSS feed)? This boggles me as certainly he would be able to get his message out more effectively.

While he continues to giving "small groups a glimpse of what the government is working on" other small groups will continue to discuss how they're going in another direction from where he's going, until they can find out from him and not what they can perchance gleen from an article they come across from the Globe & Mail. And I'll have to rely on outlets of the media (like the Globe & Mail) to inform me how Lynch is going about his renewal of the public service.

my music videos

that I like to watch at work while I'm working.

Monday, June 9, 2008

The kind of workplace of choice for the next - no, THIS generation

If the government wants to entice the younger generation to work at the government, they get some insight from young dynamic workplaces like that of Digg:


Digg Dubb: Groove Is In The Heart from Trammell on Vimeo.

It's not so much that they made this video, but that they had people who were willing to make this video and had a company supportive of the germinated idea and to see it to fruition.

Not only that, the video serves excellently as a hiring tool to help the company to show they engage their employees, beyond the lip service of other companies.

I can't help but think people like me would watch it with envy, wanting to work at such a place...

Friday, June 6, 2008

PWGSC does consulting!

I’ve learned from a friend, who will soon be working with this group, that PWGSC does consulting!

http://www.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/apropos-about/fi-fs/gcisp-ciss-eng.html
http://publiservice.tpsgc.gc.ca/conseils/text/index-e.html

My questions:
  • Are PWGSC in the best position to be doing this?
  • Is this something CSPS should consider – to deliver consulting (instead of being a pseudo-think tank?)
  • Wha-?

IRCan blog/forum site built on Drupal Open Source software

http://gccom.project.ircan.gc.ca/?q=en/node/162

Wednesday, June 4, 2008

Sunday, June 1, 2008

Google vs. Microsoft on Open Source

(Story link)

Google's Vic Gundotra, vice president of Engineering for Developer Products, declares:

"After years of competition among platforms, the web has won because it's open, because it's ubiquitous, and because there's a passionate community working together to move it forward. Openness is great for developers and for users because it knocks down hurdles to building great applications, and because it speeds the next wave of innovation by letting good ideas be shared. The web doesn't depend on any one API or tool or product, from Google or anyone else. What makes the real difference is the aggregate effect of us all working together, with open standards and open source.

Can you imagine Microsoft making that sort of a statement? Never. And that is why it fails on the web.

In sum, Microsoft still doesn't understand the Internet, the ultimate child of the open-source movement. It is the Internet that simultaneously makes Google and open source so brilliantly destructive and disruptive to Microsoft's future.

Ray Ozzie is right to be afraid.